Analysis Of The Book Grapes Of Wrath - 1436 Words

Tyler Jordan Ms. Mittleman Honors American Lit. September 14, 2014 â€Å"Humanity’s Wrathful Curtain† In his historical fiction, Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck characterizes the Joad family as one of the many migrating farming families subjected to prejudice and seclusion on their journey to California. Similarly, in T.C. Boyle’s Tortilla Curtain, Cà ¡ndido and Amà ©rica are victims of animosity and discrimination after fleeing their homes in Mexico to seek a better life in Los Angeles. In their stories, both Boyle and Steinbeck exhibit how migration can often bring new people into a different society, which can create fear and social stigma with that community. In their novels, the authors use the description of animals in nature to symbolize migrants, whom like animals, have difficulty assimilating into unknown territories, and could be treated as inferior. John Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath and T.C. Boyle’s Tortilla Curtain both illustrate barriers between mankind and nature as a vehicle to expose how humans also create barriers between each other In Tortilla Curtain, T.C. Boyle utilizes his description of the coyote in order to draw its comparison to the Mexican immigrants. The coyote makes its first appearance in the novel when Delaney and Kyra Mossbacher look into their backyard and realize one has jumped over the fence and snatched their beloved dog, Sacheverell. Distraught and infuriated, the Mossbachers decide to build a higher fence in their backyard to keep the coyotesShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Book The Grapes Of Wrath 904 Words   |  4 Pages The majority of people in the United States are lucky enough to have a place they can return to every night and call their home. Unfortunately, for the Joad and Walls families, this is not the case. The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, tells the story of the Joads, a poor family of tenant farmers forced off their farm in Oklahoma due a bank foreclosure. Because of the circumstances they suffered, including being trapped in the Dust Bowl and economic hardship, the Joads set out for CaliforniaRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Grapes Of Wrath 1193 Words   |  5 PagesTo quote Ma Joad in the film The Grapes of Wrath, â€Å"I ain t never gonna be scared no more. I was, though. For a while it looked as though we was beat. Good and beat. Looked like we didn t have nobody in the whole wide world but enemies. Like nobody was friendly no more. Made me feel kinda bad and scared too, like we was lost and nobody cared....Rich fellas come up and they die, and their kids ain’t no good and they die out. But we keep a comin’, we’re the people that live. They can’t wipe us out;Read MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Grapes Of Wrath 2169 Words   |  9 PagesThis is also known because of the fact that he uses several of his life experiences, repeatedly, throughout his various novels. Everyday strife, effects his characters in any given book. Across Steinbeck’s different works, patterns of grieving, lifestyle, and culture, are of ten mirrored across plots. Both The Grapes of Wrath and The Pearl embody Steinbeck’s archaic view of divine human culture. All his characters were real people. Through traveling and journalism, and his study of people, he has carvedRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Grapes Of Wrath 2253 Words   |  10 PagesThe Grapes of Wrath Introduction The devastating effects of the dust storms mainly in western Oklahoma and the preceding rain failure caused families to flee to California. The banks repossession for their property and homes pushes them further into depression. Unguaranteed about a better future or even about the next meal, the families take their chances. Their arrival into California is however a disappointment as there are no jobs for them. Most ‘okies’ in the Hovervilles end up dead dueRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Grapes Of Wrath 2876 Words   |  12 PagesIntroduction In chapter one of the Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck paints a picture of the severe weather occurring throughout Oklahoma and its harsh affects on the farms and farmers. In the third chapter the he gives a symbolic story of a turtle who is trying to cross a road but then is purposely hit by a driver. The turtle lands on its back and then has to greatly struggle to cross the road. The harsh weather and the mean driver both represent the hardships in life that come as a result of outsideRead MoreThe Grapes of Wrath: The Role of Ma Joad1252 Words   |  6 PagesThrough the roughest times in life, we come across crises that reveal the true character in those around us. Those who are strong are divided from the weak and the followers divide from the leaders. In the novel, The Grapes of Wrath, author John Steinbeck presents the character Ma Joad who serves an important role as the rock that keeps the family together. The Joad family, apart from many families in Oklahoma, is forced to leave their homes in search of work and better opportunities; CaliforniaRead More The Pain of the Okies Exposed in The Grapes of Wrath Essay1485 Words   |  6 PagesThe Pain of the Okies Exposed in The Grapes of Wrath      Ã‚  Ã‚   The Dust bowl was an ecological and human disaster in the Southwestern Great Plains regions of the United States in the 1930s. The areas affected were Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado. The poor handling of the land and years of drought caused this great disaster (Jones History). During this time the Okies--a name given to the migrants that traveled from Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, or anywhere in the Southwest or the northernRead MoreBlack Boy And The Grapes Of Wrath Analysis1728 Words   |  7 PagesThe bible is a pretty exhilarating book; tales of bearded men crossing deserts, talking snakes, talking bushes, forbidden fruits, floods, adultery, and pregnant virgins. What more could you want? Well, you might want to escape poverty. Logically, your next question is: can religion accomplish this task? And according to Richard Wright and John Steinbeck, the answer is a resounding â€Å"no.† Wright and Steinbeck, pump their books, Black Boy and The Grapes of Wra th, respectively, full of biblical allusionsRead MoreEssay about The Grapes of Wrath - Lifestyle in the 1930s1164 Words   |  5 PagesThe Grapes of Wrath is a historical and fictional novel that was written by John Steinbeck in 1939. He wanted to show his point of view of life in US during the years of Great Depression. This essay will talk about the lifestyle the public had during that time which dramatically changed conditions that the environment in we stern part of US had. The plot of Steinbeck?s work of fiction is rooted in the historical and social events of 1930s America, specifically the environmental disaster in OklahomaRead MoreThe Use of Symbolism in The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck1052 Words   |  5 PagesThe Use of Symbolism in The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck The Grapes of Wrath is a novel by John Steinbeck that in my opinion illustrates the terrible conditions under which the migratory farm families of America during the 1930s were forced to live under. This novel in a very descriptive and emotional way tells of one familys migration west to California from Oklahoma (the Joad family) through the great economic depression of the 1930s. The story revolves around the family having to

in Ngugi’s A Grain Of Wheat, and in Silko’s Ceremony Essay

China’s Historic Teachings of Buddhism and Confucianism Since the beginning of time the country of China, now known as the Peoples Republic of China has always been a remarkable civilization from its technologies to its philosophies. It has long been a host to a variety of fused religion/philosophical based traditions. Both the religions of Buddhism and Confucianism make up two of the three Chinese historic teachings. It is from these teachings which have had a significant role in shaping their culture, along with influencing other followers to the distance of the far west. Elements of these two belief systems are often incorporated into the traditional folk religions. For the purpose of this assignment I will briefly explain both of†¦show more content†¦He was now able to understand the answer to suffering. His understanding to the root to suffering was greediness, selfishness and stupidity. He decided that he would teach his followers that if mankind could just be rid of these negative emotions and actions, they could very wel l live a life of happiness. According to the Dalai Lama translated in book written by Thupten Jinpa, his Holiness wrote (Jinpa, 2005). According to Buddhism, compassion is an aspiration, a state of mind, wanting others to be free from suffering. Its not passive -- its not empathy alone -- but rather an empathetic altruism that actively strives to free others from suffering. Genuine compassion must have both wisdom and loving kindness. That is to say, one must understand the nature of the suffering from which we wish to free others (this is wisdom), and one must experience deep intimacy and empathy with other sentient beings (this is loving kindness). Buddhism is a cultural system of beliefs and practices based on principles of compassion and non-attachments. There are three main religious practices used by the Buddhist followers which are Meditation, Mindfulness and Compassion. The Buddhists practice using meditation encompassing a variety of techniques at which aim to develop mindfulness, concentration, powers, tranquility and insight. According to (â€Å"One-Page Overview of Buddhism†, 2004) The Buddhist concepts have also been influential onShow MoreRelatedThe Meaning and Effects of Modern Imperialism in Ngugi’s A Grain Of Wheat, and in Silko’s Ceremony1175 Words   |  5 PagesMelville’s Typee, and Ingalls’ Little House On The Prairie. On the other hand, the colonized , or natives’ reactions and struggle against imperialism was also considered, for example, in Ngugi’s A Grain Of Wheat, and in Silko’s Ceremony, and that is my main discussion in this essay. First, we can start with Ngugi’s A Grain Of Wheat. This novel talks about the people of Thabai, during Kenya’s revolutionary war, or as history knows it, the Mau Mau movement that took place during 1952 and 1960. Though to Africa

Nuclear Weapons free essay sample

Should every country have the right to possess nuclear weapons? On the 6th November 1945, a United States bomber flew towards the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The only cargo aboard that B-29 bomber was an atomic bomb – ironically nicknamed â€Å"Little Boy† that was to be dropped on its target. At 8. 15am and at a height of around 2,000ft the bomb exploded above Hiroshima, taking 140,000 lives with it. Most of the 140,000 died instantly, horrifyingly the rest of the innocent civilians that were not in direct contact with the bomb died painful deaths in the four months following. They died from radiation sickness and different types of cancers. Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as: â€Å"Totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for nothing but killing, possibly leading to the destruction of life on Earth and civilisation. We will write a custom essay sample on Nuclear Weapons or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page † He spoke nothing but the truth. US President Reagan was a nuclear abolitionist. He believed that the only reason to have nuclear weaponry was to prevent the Soviet Union from using theirs. Between them alone the United States and Russia have more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons. Why do these countries feel the need to posses so many nuclear warheads? Dominance, power and paranoia. Although some of their weapons may simply just be left over from the Cold War, this is not an excuse. They could have easily been destroyed by now. Countries like Russia and the United States crave power. In modern times the most important substance to guarantee power is weapons. Countries in possession of nuclear weapons use them to scare and intimidate other nations. One day this could backfire and the consequences would be deadly. Take North Korea and America. When Kim-Jong Un tried to invade South Korea, Barack Obama threatened them with an atomic bomb. As soon as that was done North Korea knew they had a major diplomatic issue and rescinded their threat. A major threat to world peace is the potential issue that certain smaller countries are likely to rebel against being manipulated and not having the ability to retaliate. To ensure that they avoid being bullied by bigger powers they may start to produce their own nuclear warheads. As previously stated, the reason two superpowers like Russia and the United States maintain a significant arsenal of nuclear weaponry is down to the fact that frankly, they are paranoid. If you can stockpile most of the nuclear warheads in the world then surely nobody could ever harm your country. This is certainly not the case. By having so many dangerous weapons you are not only a bigger threat to potential enemies but practically there is the additional threat that Terrorists could pose if they ever managed to secure or steal some of these weapons. Morally we should also be questioning the validity of nuclear weapons, if the leaders of a country say that it is ok to use an extreme sanction like nuclear weapons to threaten enemies then what’s to say that civilians do not do the same thing on a smaller scale? In the beginning of the atomic age atom bombs were created to end the war and to save numerous lives. By this I mean that arguably, multitudinous lives were saved due to the fact that when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima the Japanese virtually surrendered straight away. If they hadn’t surrendered the war possibly would have gone on for a lot longer. In contrast to this, look at what has become of nuclear weapons now. Instead of saving lives, atomic bombs are now kept with the intention of unnecessary mass murder. What makes the monsters that enforce the use of nuclear weaponry any different from Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot or Joseph Stalin? Even though the atomic bombs are not in use at this moment, anyone or any government in possession of these weapons have the intention to inflict large amounts of pain on vast number of people. Rajiv Gandhi said that the â€Å"nuclear war will not mean the death of one hundred million people. Or even a thousand million. It will mean the extinction of four thousand million: the end of life as we know it on planet earth. † The prospect of a nuclear war is just a horrendous thought, a thought that should never cross our minds. Recently, President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev signed a treaty saying that both countries are willing to reduce their amount of nuclear weapons by one third. It is comforting to see that the US and Russia are starting to destroy their atomic bombs but it is not good enough. They need to stop reducing their arsenal of weapons and eliminate them completely. Opponents of this idea claim that owning arnaments like atomic bombs mutually assures governments that they both have the potential for ultimate destruction. But is that really a good or virtuous thing? People who appear to be psychopaths run a number of countries. For instance take the ruler of Zimbabwe: Robert Mugabe. He is at the potentially senile age of 89. His mind is failing. Can you begin to comprehend what would happen if he got his hands on an atomic bomb? The result would be anarchy. Or take the ruler of Syria, President Assad. He has already murdered masses of people by chemical gas attack and has publicly stated that he would destroy the state of Israel. For rulers like these men to possess weapons with such a huge destructive potential is a simply ludicrous thought. If some unhinged individual were to drop an atomic bomb now it would result in retaliation and possibly the biggest global catastrophe this planet has ever seen. We need to think about the consequences. It is a statement of fact that the more of something being produced the easier it is to acquire. Yes, this can concern nuclear weapons also. When more nuclear warheads are being manufactured there is a bigger chance of them being stolen or worse being detonated. Therefore, there is a much larger risk of them falling into the wrong hands. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, there have been 18 cases of loss but most likely theft of uranium and plutonium. These elements are key when constructing a bomb. To make matters worse, there have been 11 whole nuclear bombs lost in the United States. They have never been recovered. If agencies and governments are finding it hard to keep track of their materials now, think of how impossible it would be if every country had their own arsenal of nuclear weapons? If these lost bombs are in the hands of terrorists at present I can guarantee that they will currently be considering how best to use them to maximise their effect. To conclude, the fact is that if every country were to have the right to possess nuclear weapons we would all be living in constant fear of attack. Our lives would be very different; we would be insecure with regards to our safety and this would impact greatly on how we lived our lives – we would need to be significantly more vigilant. A small example of this is the potential effect that liquid explosives has on air travel where we can’t take any fluids that are more than 100ml into an airport.  That is just for liquid explosives, what limits would be required to ensure nuclear components weren’t being smuggled? If one country were to drop a bomb it would set off a chain reaction, all it would take is for one rogue state or organisation to detonate a bomb and the world would effectively end through nuclear Armageddon.

The Plague Essay Research Paper Small pox free essay sample

The Plague Essay, Research Paper Small syphilis. Tuberculosis. AIDS. These diseases have been considered epidemics at assorted points throughout the history of the universe. None of them, nevertheless, had such an impact on the population and civilization of the people than did the Black Death. The Black Death was a disease that invaded England in the center of the 14th century. Reports on the entire sum deceased have varied from between 25 per centum and 50 per centum of the European population. However, it is known that many 1000000s of people were eliminated from the English population, and that the Black Death was a accelerator for societal alteration within Europe. The civilization and lives of all people rich and hapless was changed everlastingly due to the effects of the Black Death. First, the Black Death had a great consequence on the upper category in England. This disease did non know apart. A rich adult male when put into contact with the disease was merely every bit likely to get the disease as was a hapless adult male. We will write a custom essay sample on The Plague Essay Research Paper Small pox or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The epidemic changed many common patterns in England that no adult male had of all time been able to command before the disease. One consequence the Black Death had on England? s upper category was that it reduced the figure of members significantly. When the deathly disease struck landholders and their households, their lands would go through to the closest household member. This pattern was really common and caused the estates of the lasting landholders to go really big. So, the Black Death shrunk the upper category and made it wealthier at the same clip. Though the disease made the upper category wealthier in lands, working the lands became less profitable. Because the population of the people paid to work the land was besides reduced by 25 to fifty per centum, there were fewer people to work the land. This happening promoted higher rewards from the worker and less entire net income for the landholder. The Black Death besides had an impact on the lives of the lower category and the common mans. The effects of the disease were non all negative. In some ways, the disease really improved the quality of life for the common individual in England. One manner that the Black Death improved life was by raising the rewards paid to the people who worked the land. Because the disease obliterated so much of the English population, there became a seve re deficit of labour. When you combine this premiss with the economic rules of supply and demand, alterations take topographic point in England. With the deficit of workers and the demand for people to work the land, a competitory market was created. Wagess greatly increased. Working conditions improved. The disease besides caused an addition in regard for the common man. The provincials and the yeoman really prospered more in England than they of all time had. Another consequence the disease had on England was that it opened up lands for the common mans to have and or work. Though the sum of land a common man owned may be little, if the same individual works the land that owns the land, the outputs are normally traveling to be greater than if the work is farmed out to engage custodies. Recovery from the Black Death was a really gradual procedure. England? s population would non be every bit great as before the disease for a twosome of centuries. It was common for a household to hold no male heirs three coevalss subsequently, so its impact on the population was really terrible. The Black Death did go forth many factors for a strong recovery. Because of the lessening in population, there was a great excess of land. Commoners who worked their ain land as a consequence of the land excess prospered. Besides in excess was nutrient. This big supply of nutrient was more than adequate to prolong the population left spared by the Black Death. A rise in the rewards of the common individual was another consequence the disease had on England. When you combine these three factors, land excess, nutrient excess, and high rewards, England? s population recovered. It must be understood that it took a twosome of hundred old ages to to the full reconstruct the population, as replacing 1000000s of people doesn? T occur in one coevals. The Black Death is frequently looked upon as a really negative disease in history, but it besides had many positive effects. England needed the disease to decelerate its jobs of overpopulation. The Black Death besides helped England draw itself out of the stagnation of the Middle Ages, as a market economic system really developed more quickly due to the disease. Bettering the lives of the common people was another positive consequence the disease had on England. As has been the instance many times throughout history, in times of crisis, people will demo their resiliency and persevere. 31b